- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <po@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 21:19:21 -0500
- To: "'GL - WAI Guidelines WG'" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Hi Phill, This is where the support pages on the W3C site come in. All the "UNTIL" clauses point to a chain that provides info about when "UNTIL" is met There is some question as to whether W3C would make the judgement or whether authors would. I believe that W3c working groups should call it when it happens just like it calls what goes into the guidelines. Too difficult for authors otherwise. But that is not critical. Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Human Factors Dept of Ind. Engr. - U of Wis. Director - Trace R & D Center Gv@trace.wisc.edu, http://trace.wisc.edu/ FAX 608/262-8848 For a list of our listserves send "lists" to listproc@trace.wisc.edu -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of pjenkins@us.ibm.com Sent: Monday, April 26, 1999 2:48 PM To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: Re: PRI - 7 Client Side Image Maps I agree that the intent of this "until user agents..." clause are met that the P3 will be removed. It begs the question whether the GL charter, or the WAI charter really outlines "who and how" this information will be communicated to content authors and developers. 12 months from now (4 web years), who will be charted to review the P3's and/or the "until user agents..." and the "now that this is supported..." clauses? I would recommend that this concern be forwarded to the coordination group and/or on to the WAI advisory committee. Regards, Phill Jenkins
Received on Monday, 26 April 1999 22:21:10 UTC