- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <po@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Sat, 24 Apr 1999 15:40:13 -0500
- To: "'Jason White'" <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.EDU.AU>, "GL - WAI Guidelines WG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
I would agree except for the firewall issue (people in companies are not allowed to send their info outside the firewall for processing) and the fact that it is very hard to get new code added to a server within a company. They are VERY strict and slow on approving misc CGIs on their servers. So it makes server translators hard to use for corporate users. Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Human Factors Dept of Ind. Engr. - U of Wis. Director - Trace R & D Center Gv@trace.wisc.edu, http://trace.wisc.edu/ FAX 608/262-8848 For a list of our listserves send "lists" to listproc@trace.wisc.edu -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jason White Sent: Thursday, April 22, 1999 6:11 PM To: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Subject: Checkpoint 10.3 Further to today's discussion of checkpoint 10.3, I would point out that linearization can be carried out on the server side with an appropriate script, provided that the pages are written in such a way that they can be linearized and structural markup is used correctly (see the proposed wording of checkpoint 5.3). I would therefore argue that if checkpoint 10.3 is retained, it would not place as much of a burden on web site developers as some would suggest. I have noticed the debate within the interest group on this topic. Whereas my personal view is that the "until" clause in 10.3 is largely satisfied today, and that the requirement would be substantially met if linearization tools were widely available for major graphical browsers, I am concerned by the apparent controversy surrounding this point within the interest group. It might be better to retain the checkpoint and to clarify the situation in the techniques document. In essence, while I would like to be able to delete 10.3 I would not be comfortable in doing so.
Received on Saturday, 24 April 1999 16:42:03 UTC