- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 12:43:30 -0400 (EDT)
- To: David Clark <dmclark@cast.org>
- cc: "WAI-gl (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
For images they have an innate size. Some browsers slow down if they don't know how big an image is (others don't seem to. Is there some trick?) until they have got the whole image. In general it is preferable not to use image sizes in pixels, but it might be worth allowing this as an exception. It might not - it might be better to lower the priority. Charles McCN On Tue, 20 Apr 1999, David Clark wrote: I know this is extremely late in the process, but I just realized the implications of 3.7, and I do not think it is realistic I agree that for most elements, proportional spacing is preferable. But for images? I thought it was preferable to set up a size so that the browser knows how to set-up the page. I am going to be asked to defend this checkpoint, and, right now, I do not know how. What am I not getting? David Clark CAST, Inc.
Received on Tuesday, 20 April 1999 12:43:33 UTC