- From: Nir Dagan <nir@nirdagan.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 04:40:53 GMT
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
It is true that many sites are hosted in a fashion that limits the maintainer's ability to configure the server. Yet I think that there are many who can configure their servers and don't, as well as many who would like to be able to configure their servers if they were aware of the disadvantages of a misconfigured server. With respect to Chris's comment: "...I believe most authors have no control over their server settings. They don't have their own domain name; they're hosted as a user web under their web presence provider. They have neither the authority, skills, nor inclination to modify server settings." 1. A great deal of servers in use (e.g. Apache ) allow a great deal of configuration to be excuted via text files located in the same directories were the HTML files are located. As every site maintainer has access to upload their HTML files they can upload the configuration files likewise. I think that most commercial providers allow for some configuration on individual accouts. Restrictions are done mainly with respect to server load and security considerations. 2. The skills needed to write these files are not more complicated than doing some quasi-HTML hack that achieves a similar effect in a less efficient way. A simple example is HTTP redirect vs. META refresh tag. 3. A great deal of websites that run on their own domain and even on dedicated servers use quasi-HTML hacks instead of HTTP. Just go to microsoft.com with a browser that doesn't refresh automatically with META refresh and see what happens. I am sure that this site doesn't run on a free Geocities account. 4. These site maintainers that cannot configure their server should be aware of the disadvantages of this situation. In respect to Chris's other comment: "I don't think W3C currently has any appropriate location for such issues, since it doesn't fall under Authors, Authoring Tools, or User Agents. Maybe W3C needs to add "Webmaster Guidelines" to identify the responsibilities and skillsets involved in optimizing server settings for accessibility considerations." Here I absolutely disagree. We don't have separate guidelines for the producer of the text, the HTML coder, the graphics designer, the producer of video clips and the programmer of Java applets. In many websites these functions and more are done by separate individuals. W3C doesn't tell them how to coordinate their tasks. From the W3C's view all of these functions are a done by a single entity "the author" or "content provider". Administration of the server is one of the tasks of the "content provider". Regards, Nir Dagan, Ph.D. http://www.nirdagan.com mailto:nir@nirdagan.com "There is nothing quite so practical as a good theory." -- A. Einstein
Received on Tuesday, 15 December 1998 14:39:46 UTC