- From: Al Gilman <asgilman@access.digex.net>
- Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1998 07:44:00 -0500 (EST)
- To: nir.dagan@econ.upf.es
- Cc: c.g.colwell@herts.ac.uk, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
to follow up on what nir.dagan@econ.upf.es said: > HTML4.0 should be the default HTML level of the guidelines. > Other versions are authoring-wise obsolete. > I can't see a reason to mention that IMG is available > in HTML2.0 and HTML3.2 when these HTML versions are > obsolete. Could you expand a little on what you mean by obsolete? If an author writes in HTML2.0, does it work in most browsers, or does it break? Al
Received on Friday, 6 November 1998 07:59:23 UTC