- From: Al Gilman <asgilman@access.digex.net>
- Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1998 16:59:37 -0400 (EDT)
- To: chisholm@trace.wisc.edu (Wendy A Chisholm)
- Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
to follow up on what Wendy A Chisholm said: > Note. Alternative pages should be provided only after you have > tried all of the other pertinent techniques outlined in this > document to make your original page accessible. Maybe we can give a little more background than this. Sites incorporating alternate pages can be highly effective and fully accessible. It is just hard to do right and some people may still take offense. > Another option is to provide a phone number, fax number, > e-mail, or postal adress where information is available and > accessible, preferably 24 hours a day. Somehow the scoping is wrong in this discussion. Site providers are not going to decide to provide 24-hour 800-number service based on a single page. And this does not come in the right place in the flow. This is not just a "note." "Another option" here is at the level of "you MUST provide a link to an alternative page." The MUST goes away if you provide effective communication by means of a non-Web communications channel. The MUST requirement is a requirement for effective communication. The site sponsor's checklist is "By what other means is this information available? If trying to get this information by means of the Web is turning in to a 'beating a dead horse' proposition, help the user bail out to another way of getting the information that will work for them." If the information is available by non-Web means this should be explained in some sort of "who we are" page which does not have to be the home page, but the path to it should be reasonably obvious. > <a href="wai-gl-techniques.html#alternative-pages">Guidelines and methods > for creating alternative pages</a> > > ----- in wai-gl-techniques.html#alternative-pages --- > 1. discussion of possible ways to create alternative pages > 2. discussion about linking between alternative pages (alt to alt, rather > than alt to original, etc.) Repeat/expand discussion of where to put references to alternative services where same information is available in techniques document. Basically, this should be once in sponsor identification per site and additionally at the entry to anywhere that usability may be rough for any group of user. Site design pointers (relates to linking alternative pages into the site): If there is a site index or "how to use this site" guide, it should be extra accessible. This can furnish the effect of an alternative home page even if the site is not fully dualized. Review how obvious it is to get from an arbitrary page to this index or guide, and how easy it is to get to an arbitrary topic from this index or guide, as part of the accessiblility and usability review of the site architecture. Remember that many visitors drop into an arbitrary page and do not start at the home page. Al
Received on Wednesday, 16 September 1998 16:58:36 UTC