- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <po@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1998 12:36:22 -0500
- To: <dd@w3.org>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Daniel Wrote I think the priority wording should be different than for Guidelines. In fact, it is confusing to use the same term (Priority) as for the guidelines. I'd prefer if we use [1st Choice] or [Preferred] [Advised]. GV: The priorities for the techniques are used in the guidelines document. In fact the rating for the guidelines and the rating for the techniques are tied together. So the two are directly related. It would be very confusing to have two different ratings in the same doc. Also, I think it is the techniques where the ratings are most important… since it is there that the authors will evaluate their pages and decide what is important to do or not… or whether their pages pass or not. So we think they need to be the same. In fact we think it is important that they be the same. Your thoughts? Others thoughts? -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Human Factors Dept of Ind. Engr. - U of Wis. Director - Trace R & D Center Gv@trace.wisc.edu, http://trace.wisc.edu/ FAX 608/262-8848 For a list of our listserves send "lists" to listproc@trace.wisc.edu
Received on Friday, 4 September 1998 13:30:53 UTC