- From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 06 Aug 1998 15:50:30 +0200
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
I raised this issue in Peterborough and took an action item to clarify what I meant by email. The current document has 5 sections: A Modality Independence. B Output Display Independence. C Control Device Independence. D Meta-information. E General Recommendations. I think it's too complex and it's hard to understand what modality vs output vs control device means, compared to say, meta-information (it's all meta data at some level...). For instance, how does "graceful degradation" (C.1) relates to "C. Control Device Independence." ? Or, why aren't "grouping selection in form" and "using list for list" not in the same section ? why aren't "title for frame" and "alt for imagemap" not together (they both allow for building a serialized version of an otherwise 2-D graphical presentation) ? I think we should aim for 2 or 3 sections: A Descriptive information B Structure/Navigation Under "Descriptive information", I would put - image alt, longdesc, video caption, audio transcipt, frame title, abbrev, acronym, alt script/applet All the things one has to add (i.e. attach) to pieces of data in the document. Under "Structure/Navigation" - separation content/style, lang, nesting, keyaccess, form grouping, table markup, link phrase, color scheme Thinds are that are more intrinsic to the document "fiber". A third possible section would be like section E today: "General guidelines" - comply to standard HTML/CSS - if all fail, use text-only page although this could be folded in the intro (for HTML/CSS) and the conclucion (for text-only) I think this would greatly simplify the understanding of the guidelines.
Received on Thursday, 6 August 1998 09:50:12 UTC