- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charlesn@sunrise.srl.rmit.edu.au>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 16:19:08 +1000 (EST)
- To: Skill Zone <sue@skillzone.demon.co.uk>
- cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
The must / should / may approach is borrowed from W3C technical specs. I think thta to go with it there should be a 'top ten bad moves' list. But the only one of those I read was in a book about how to use fancy Javascripts and applets to make your website completely useless. Oh, I mean look really flash on your own computer, and some people like you. It does indeed rely on the W3C guidelines. And it is not a substitute - it is a 'dumbed down' version for a quick look. But it does seem an approach that can provide an interim level solution. I would be interested to hear what others think who have followed the guidelines from the beginning, but my feeling is that they are themselves becoming simpler and better written. (Since I get up at 6am every week to try and achieve this I hope so....) Charles McCathieNevile (As always, this is my own opinion. I just try and get a lot for my 2 cents.)
Received on Monday, 20 July 1998 02:40:52 UTC