- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charlesn@sunrise.srl.rmit.edu.au>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jul 1998 18:50:38 +1000 (EST)
- To: WAI GL <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
From a functional (users) point of view, Style sheets degrade gracefully. If their browser doesn't use the style sheet it should not cause a problem, since they will (theoretically) be left with clean, straightforward, properly marked up HTML which lacks a little in presentational pizazz. This is not a bad thing. It is only from the point of view of a designer that there may be a problem. Somehow this should be an approach of EO - designing for the latest Frames and DHTML capable browsers is similar to designing for properly compliant browsers - both mean a portion of the audience are not going to get what you are trying to offer. The difference is that design which is based on acessibility means that the audience get the information, whereas design based on gee-whiz technology doesn't. I think this approach works for things other than Style Sheets, although I was surprised to discover in this morning's teleconference that MSIE3 doesn't provide the content of a Java Applet, only the ALT. (Mark in the black book) (On a side note, I had a call from somebody working in the University today, who couldn't get into a website. At all. Turns out that Netscape 2.01, which is a common browser around this Institute of Technology, doesn't cope well with Java-based navigation systems where there is no alternative. When the website owner is told that it had taken $80 of advice for one person to find that out maybe they'll re-think the cost of accessibility) Charles McCathieNevile
Received on Friday, 10 July 1998 05:12:01 UTC