- From: Nir Dagan <nir.dagan@econ.upf.es>
- Date: Fri, 03 Jul 1998 19:49:46 GMT
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Frames are a mechnism of _displaying_ different pieces of content in independent windows in _scrolling medium_ It is impossible to make sense of frames in other media such as print. In other words, frames are a presentational hint, for particular media. Therefore, stylesheets should be used for making frames. I am not isolated in this opinion: "...Frames aren't considered as the way to go. CSS2 and its positioning capabilities is the preferred way." Arnaud Le Hors in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html/1998May/0018.html The WAI authoring guidelines should state clearly: "Frames only via stylesheets". HTML4.0 includes frames as a requirement from browsers, for backward compatibility with existing documents, not as a recommendation for authors. (see citation above, again) People who wrote these existing documents aren't going to read the WAI guidelines anyway since they are doing cool things and don't care about the purist nerds from W3C or about their own readers. Have you ever seen a frames site written in valid HTML4.0? I didn't. You know why? Only authors who care about portability write valid documents. But authors who care about portability don't write frames. A realistic goal of WAI is to avoid new sites written in HTML frames. For achieving this, one has to be very clear against HTML frames. Regards, Nir Dagan Assistant Professor of Economics Universitat Pompeu Fabra Barcelona (Spain) email: dagan@upf.es Website: http://www.econ.upf.es/%7Edagan/
Received on Friday, 3 July 1998 07:04:00 UTC