- From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Mar 1998 18:12:37 +0100
- To: Chris Maden <crism@ora.com>
- cc: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
> [Suzan Dolloff] > > I received a couple of emails after my reply to your initial request > > for review suggesting this probably isn't the most appropriate > > discussion for this list. > > Messages that are purely reviews of Joyce's site probably are > inappropriate. However, a lot of good points about general > accessibility design have been raised, and messages relating to those > should be kept on the list, IMO. On a WAI list, yes, but not on this one: I suggest wai-w3c-gl, the Page Authoring guidelines list, where issues about Markup accessibility are the main topic. I'm ccing this message on both, so that GL people are aware of this past thread, but you should now only answer gl, not ig. Thanks.
Received on Wednesday, 25 March 1998 12:12:51 UTC