- From: Al Gilman <asgilman@access.digex.net>
- Date: Thu, 5 Mar 1998 09:24:05 -0500 (EST)
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
to follow up on what Charles McCathieNevile said: > The site www.teddyworks.com.au was a project that got > shelved. It was a frame based site, which was intended to work > equally well without frames. A major consideration in the > original project was that for it to be maintained it would have > to have a single version that worked properly, rather than be > built as two versions of the same site. I like this for a vest-pocket example. You can get around it and observe the safety net links in almost no time. I had been thinking of "in-vivo" examples which are real sites that are currently doing something. But it's good to have one or two "in-vitro" examples, too. > Thanks - awaiting the praise and criticism ;) I had just one change suggestion. The ALT text "No frames please" is, to me, jargon that may not communicate except to Web groupies and particularly HTML speakers. I don't have an overwhelming favorite for what to call this link, but something like "Frames-free home" might convey what is available at the end of the link a little more reliably. Al
Received on Thursday, 5 March 1998 09:24:41 UTC