- From: Greg Lowney <greglo@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Mar 1998 18:24:26 -0800
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org, Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
- Cc: dsr@w3.org
Another category of "simple table" is tables with only a single cell each. Such tables are frequently used for purely formatting purposes and aids should have no problem working with them, by ignoring the fact that they are tables and only looking at standard attributes such as coloration, title=, etc. ---------- From: Daniel Dardailler[SMTP:danield@w3.org] Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 1998 5:36 AM To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Cc: dsr@w3.org Subject: Re: TABLES - To label or not to label > Question 1: Should a guideline state that labeling of simple tables is not > [required]? yes > If yes, then: > > Question 2: When does a table become complicated enough for labeling to be > [required]? This is of course the tough question. I talked to Dave Raggett about this issue and I think we both agree that there is a threshold below which a table can be considered "simple". I propose the following: - if it only has a single row of header cells at the top and/or - if it only has a single column of header cells on the left side (modulo right-to-left directionality) In these two cases (which should be treated together), given a cell, it is really easy for an agent to find the column and the row header they belong to without requiring the author to add more markup. In other words, there is a potential "default" value for the scope attribute on TH that can be defined as: - if all the cells in a row (TR) are header (TH), then scope defaults to col - if only the first cell in a row (TR) is a header (TH) then scope defaults to row We might go as far as trying to define default values for rowgroup and colgroup cases (covering sub-headers) but I'd be happy with just that in the guidelines. > Note 2: labeling refers to the new TABLE markup available in HTML 4.0 such > as header, id, scope, and summary summary and abbrev should be RECOMMENDED regardless of the above, they do no serve navigation but description.
Received on Wednesday, 4 March 1998 21:24:42 UTC