- From: Charles (Chuck) Oppermann <chuckop@MICROSOFT.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 1998 19:19:14 -0800
- To: "'dd@w3.org'" <dd@w3.org>
- Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
I'm happy with this attitude. Thanks for the clarification Daniel. -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Dardailler [mailto:danield@w3.org] Sent: Thursday, February 12, 1998 12:52 AM To: Charles (Chuck) Oppermann Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: Re: ALT text survey Chuck wrote: > If we load up the guidelines with exceptions and such, the author > will not be as understanding to the problem and less likely to make > a change. Lets make this document incredibly lightweight and useful > rather than a series of workarounds. It's not a secret that it's my position as well, i.e. "Get the guidelines straight and fix the browsers - We're working for the future generation", but we're in a world of consensus building and I'm happy with the classification system we adopted: Required/Recommended and Interim/New. So rather that saying > Guidelines should not work around browser implementation. I prefer to say that I'm fine with mentioning current browser issues as long as they are properly marked (Interim/Recommended in that case).
Received on Friday, 13 February 1998 22:19:34 UTC