- From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 16:16:46 +0100
- To: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>
- cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
> I'm not sure why these guidelines are called "Page Author" > guidelines instead of "HTML Author" guidelines. While > some of the guidelines might be useful for XML > or other languages, most are specific to HTML and the > term "page" doesn't capture that sufficiently. HTML was not deemed ideal because it's also about CSS, XML as you say, but overall, maybe we better call a cat a cat (is that an english proverb as well ?) and I agree we can use the name HTML which has a better marketing appeal. > For that reason, during my edits, I changed the > title to "HTML Author Guidelines". HTML Authoring Guidelines sounds better, so that it's not confused with guidelines for HTML designers (that is, the HTML WG). Too far-fetched maybe ?
Received on Friday, 23 January 1998 10:17:09 UTC