- From: Liam Quinn <liam@htmlhelp.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Jun 1998 21:37:32 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
- Cc: Leslie Brogger <leslie.brogger@born.com>
At 06:13 PM 03/06/98 -0700, Charles (Chuck) Oppermann wrote: >To me, the real question is "As author, am I trying to impart a particular >look and feel, or am I trying to structure my HTML-based documents?" If >look and feel, use presentation elements like <B>, or better yet, use >CSS-equivalents. If structure, use the appropriate structure tags. For optimum accessibility, structural elements should always be used. If the author wishes to impart a particular look and feel, then CSS easily hooks into a well-structured document, providing the author more flexibility if he or she decides that all those B elements should actually have been I elements. If the author is concerned about the bland look that old browsers like Netscape 3.x will give to the CSS-styled document, then supplementing the structural elements with presentation elements can be relatively harmless in terms of accessibility, though it does reduce the flexibility of the author and user to change the presentation. An example of safely combining structural and presentation elements is the following: <H1 align="center"><I>Heading</I></H1> You could also include the FONT element, <H1 align="center"><FONT color="red" face="Verdana"><I>Heading</I></FONT></H1> but I would not for accessibility and usability reasons explained at <http://www.mcsr.olemiss.edu/%7Emudws/font.html>. -- Liam Quinn
Received on Wednesday, 3 June 1998 21:37:20 UTC