- From: Chris Ridpath <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 10:23:26 -0400
- To: <dd@w3.org>
- Cc: "WAI ER WG List" <w3c-wai-er-wg@w3.org>
Hmmm. If a document contained an image and the purpose of the document was to describe the image then would that document be the LONGDESC file for the image? Perhaps the prompt for a LONGDESC should be something like: You need a LONGDESC if the image is complex and it's not described in this document. Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org> To: Chris Ridpath <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca> Cc: WAI ER WG List <w3c-wai-er-wg@w3.org> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 1999 9:53 AM Subject: Re: PROPOSAL - 1.1.B, 4.3.A - 1st call > > > http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/IG/ert.html#Technique1.1.B > > For longdesc, there is the valid case where the image is complex, > there's no longdesc attribute, but the "longdesc" is inline, that is, > described in html markup close to the image (e.g. "Figure 1 presents > our new organization chart with Greg on top, Daniel at the bottom, > etc".) >
Received on Wednesday, 18 August 1999 10:23:43 UTC