Re: Draft ERT WG Charter for review and comment from Katie Haritos-Shea on 2004-06-07 (w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org from June 2004)

From: Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 13:05:00 -0700 (PDT)
To: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>, w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
Cc: Josh Krieger <josh@zafu.com>
Message-ID: <25084492.1086638700725.JavaMail.root@grover.psp.pas.earthlink.net>

Ditto on the Web Services.....................Katie

-----Original Message-----
From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
Sent: Jun 7, 2004 10:01 AM
To: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
Cc: Josh Krieger <josh@zafu.com>
Subject: Re: Draft ERT WG Charter for review and comment

As such things go, it seems OK but I would like to see the "goal/mission" 
to be more towards getting a Web Service facility from the process rather 
than a "recommendation", i.e. we should be moving towards a validator/fixer 
like Tidy instead of guideline type document.

Less discussion, more coding so that it gets to be at least as usable as Bobby.

--
Love.

Everyone/everything/everywhere/always connected

Received on Monday, 7 June 2004 16:05:02 UTC