- From: Chris Ridpath <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 12:09:53 -0500
- To: "WAI ER IG List" <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
We've been working on creating a standard set of accessibility checks that may be used by anyone interested in testing web pages for accessibility problems. The current draft version of these checks are collected into the Open Accessibility Checks [1]. I'd like to refine the format of these checks and create a more solid specification. The Evaluation And Report Language (EARL) [2] uses RDF to describe the accessibility status of a page but does not contain a specification for describing accessibility checks. It looks like we could extend EARL or perhaps create another RDF dialect for describing the checks so that the more of the accessibility testing process can be described in RDF. My current design of the checks uses an XML file that can be converted into both text and machine code. The text version is necessary so that a person can understand and implement the check. The direct translation into machine code means that the checks can be easily implemented and modified. This strategy seems to be practical and transforming it to RDF should not be too difficult. A known problem with EARL is that it lacks the ability to specify the exact thing that's causing the accessibility problem. Perhaps as we work through the standardizing of the accessibility checks a solution to this problem will arise. There are currently about 130 checks and the number will likely get much larger so finding, sorting and grouping the appropriate checks can be difficult. The textual description of the check is helpful for a person but is not very good for machine processing. I'm hoping that adding RDF into the mix will help solve these problems. Before going any further with the design for an RDF version of the checks I should stop and listen to comments. Please speak up if you have feelings for/against a more standard method of expressing accessibility checks in RDF. [1] http://www.aprompt.ca/oac/ [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10/ Cheers, Chris
Received on Tuesday, 3 February 2004 12:29:40 UTC