- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@sidar.org>
- Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2004 13:31:04 +1000
- To: ER <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
Hi folks, we have just about completed the EARL output for Hera <http://www.sidar.org/hera> We were wondering if an earl:Tool can have an earl:email (I have been using foaf:mbox to identify assertors, but I think we will use both earl:name and earl:email and foaf:name and foaf:mbox now). In general is it a good idea to keep the name and email properties in the EARL schema? It seems to me that we are better off moving them out, or defining them as being properties of tools, and using foaf:Person to identify assertors who are people. earl:Person is a subclass of Assertor, as is earl:Tool. I think we'd be better off saying that an earl:Assertor has a range that includes foaf:Person and earl:Tool. whaddaya think? cheers -- Charles McCathieNevile Fundación Sidar charles@sidar.org http://www.sidar.org
Received on Friday, 2 April 2004 22:35:36 UTC