RE: EARL Testcase Clarification

yes. this makes sense to me. for example a manual check could be such a
test.

regards,
  shadi


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Ridpath [mailto:chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca] 
> Sent: Donnerstag, 04. Dezember 2003 18:08
> To: Shadi Abou-Zahra
> Cc: 'WAI ER IG List'
> Subject: Re: EARL Testcase Clarification
> 
> 
> OK. And what if the test is required by several guidelines?
> 
> Would you just repeat the earl:Testcase block?
> 
> Example:
> 
> <earl:Testcase rdf:resource=http://guidelines.org/guideline.html>
>  <earl:testId rdf:resource=http://checks.org/test25.html />  
> </earl:Testcase>
> 
> <earl:Testcase 
> rdf:resource=http://other-guidelines.org/requirement.html>
>  <earl:testId rdf:resource=http://checks.org/test25.html />  
> </earl:Testcase>
> 
> <earl:Testcase 
> rdf:resource=http://more-guidelines.org/checkpoint.html>
>  <earl:testId rdf:resource=http://checks.org/test25.html />  
> </earl:Testcase>
> 
> Chris
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Shadi Abou-Zahra" <shadi@w3.org>
> To: "'Chris Ridpath'" <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>
> Cc: "'WAI ER IG List'" <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 10:52 AM
> Subject: RE: EARL Testcase Clarification
> 
> 
> > this is the way i interpreted it as well. while the test is 
> defined by 
> > the tool, the testcase is the requirement of the guideline. 
> this way a 
> > tool can conduct multiple tests to judge conformance to a 
> checkpoint.
> > 
> > regards,
> >   shadi
> > 
> > 
>

Received on Thursday, 4 December 2003 12:26:26 UTC