- From: Lisa Seeman <seeman@netvision.net.il>
- Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2002 10:42:57 +0200
- To: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
Thanks Wendy, Yup, we have been looking into rdf and accessibility, emphasizing RDF accessibility support techniques in contrast to evaluation techniques. A care taker or volunteer could retrofit a site through annotation and these annotations could be available to anyone, making the site publicly accessible. I will try to get a demonstration going, although probably not this week. Would this list be interested in reviewing this work, and maybe explore incorporation with EARL ? All the best, Lisa Seeman UnBounded Access Widen the World Web lisa@ubaccess.com <mailto:lisa@ubaccess.com> www.ubaccess.com <http://www.ubaccess.com/> Tel: +972 (2) 675-1233 Fax: +972 (2) 675-1195 -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-er-ig-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-er-ig-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Wendy A Chisholm Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 6:28 PM To: Lisa Seeman; w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org Subject: Re: annotation server for EARL and accessibility Lisa, One exists. [1] refer to the chat log on 1 August 2002 for more info. [2] Do you have a planned use for it? Best, --wendy [1] http://earl.w3.org/earl [2] http://notabug.com/er/chatlogs/2002-08-01.html At 11:59 PM 11/4/02, Lisa Seeman wrote: >Do you think there would be an advantage if we had an annotation server for >reserved for accessibility purposes? (I think the W3C annotation server is >meant to be used for testing purposes.) > >Lisa Seeman -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI/ /--
Received on Wednesday, 6 November 2002 03:43:59 UTC