- From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 17:49:54 -0000
- To: <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
"Wendy A Chisholm" <wendy@w3.org> > Discussion about making testmode a property of the Assertor or the Assertion. > [http://notabug.com/er/chatlogs/2002-12-11.html#T18-29-39] > > We had a 2-to-1 split on how to resolve this. The stronger position is to > only allow mode as a property of assertion because allowing it on assertor > requires an extra processing step that might not be handled by current tools. I'm inclined towards having it on the assertion, but the cost here is a lack of brevity so it would be nice if it could be inherited, I don't see much of a problem in having it in both places. The downside is that the naive tool won't know what type of test was done, that's hardly disastrous though. > Currently, the schema says: > <rdf:Property rdf:about="&earl;reprOf" rdfs:label="reprOf"> > <rdfs:range rdf:resource="&rdfs;Resource"/> > <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="&earl;WebContent"/> > > Leaving the range open so that people can extend as needed. I understood you never used range rdf:resource="rdfs:resource" anyway, since everything is a resource so it's an entirely redundant statement. I could be wrong though, my experience is limited. Jim.
Received on Thursday, 12 December 2002 12:50:19 UTC