- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 15:10:48 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- cc: <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
Hi folks,
I am not available for any of that.
I would like us to create an EARL version 0.96 very soon, but for the moment
to defer claiming a 1.0 spec.
I would like to put forward a proposal for locations: Having a location
scheme that provides the following possibilities:
element/attribute name (should these be a differentiated type?)
Xpointer
Fuzzy pointer
id
occurrence of given element (i.e. table number 7)
line number
character offset (starting with the pointy bracket??)
whether the document referred to is a copy of something, or the live
version (this is what I understand by hsft's webName, which is related to
the question Adobe ased about how to deal with information initially as a
local copy of something that will later be updated to the Web).
Would be useful I think. It allows us to meet the differnt impleented methods
of finding something in a document, although I am not sure if there is
interoperability. It is also clear that some of these are more robust than
others over given changes - i.e. "better", but not necessarily useful for
software people have.
Chaals
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Wendy A Chisholm wrote:
Hello all,
Let's schedule a period of a few hours - 17:00 to 22:00 GMT on Wednesday -
and then people can chat whenever they are able.
Server: irc.w3.org
Port: 6665
Channel: #er
Agenda:
- At our chat last Wednesday we noted one issue:
1. Identifying specific elements on the page. XPointers are ideal, but they
can change as the document is modified. Jim and Nick implemented fuzzy
pointers - Nick's statement of problem and proposal for solution - 11 April
2002. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-er-ig/2002Apr/0029.html
- Here are agenda items not covered last week:
1. i want to go through the ontology and make sure that all the Things
that could be asserted to be disjoint are [from EricP]
2. cardinality (particularly of dates) [from wendy and eric]
3. test corpus [from Nick]
4. direction forward: goal is stable EARL. based on earl test 1.0? slimmed
down more? [from wendy]
5. go through Nick's new proxy
the 1.0 test Schema. SBP's n3 version at:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-er-ig/2002Apr/att-0002/01-20020403-160839.n3
I converted it to xml rdf at:
http://www.w3.org/2002/04/earl1-0.rdf
--
Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +33 4 92 38 78 22
Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia
(or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Tuesday, 30 April 2002 15:10:48 UTC