- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 15:10:48 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- cc: <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
Hi folks, I am not available for any of that. I would like us to create an EARL version 0.96 very soon, but for the moment to defer claiming a 1.0 spec. I would like to put forward a proposal for locations: Having a location scheme that provides the following possibilities: element/attribute name (should these be a differentiated type?) Xpointer Fuzzy pointer id occurrence of given element (i.e. table number 7) line number character offset (starting with the pointy bracket??) whether the document referred to is a copy of something, or the live version (this is what I understand by hsft's webName, which is related to the question Adobe ased about how to deal with information initially as a local copy of something that will later be updated to the Web). Would be useful I think. It allows us to meet the differnt impleented methods of finding something in a document, although I am not sure if there is interoperability. It is also clear that some of these are more robust than others over given changes - i.e. "better", but not necessarily useful for software people have. Chaals On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Wendy A Chisholm wrote: Hello all, Let's schedule a period of a few hours - 17:00 to 22:00 GMT on Wednesday - and then people can chat whenever they are able. Server: irc.w3.org Port: 6665 Channel: #er Agenda: - At our chat last Wednesday we noted one issue: 1. Identifying specific elements on the page. XPointers are ideal, but they can change as the document is modified. Jim and Nick implemented fuzzy pointers - Nick's statement of problem and proposal for solution - 11 April 2002. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-er-ig/2002Apr/0029.html - Here are agenda items not covered last week: 1. i want to go through the ontology and make sure that all the Things that could be asserted to be disjoint are [from EricP] 2. cardinality (particularly of dates) [from wendy and eric] 3. test corpus [from Nick] 4. direction forward: goal is stable EARL. based on earl test 1.0? slimmed down more? [from wendy] 5. go through Nick's new proxy the 1.0 test Schema. SBP's n3 version at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-er-ig/2002Apr/att-0002/01-20020403-160839.n3 I converted it to xml rdf at: http://www.w3.org/2002/04/earl1-0.rdf -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +33 4 92 38 78 22 Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Tuesday, 30 April 2002 15:10:48 UTC