- From: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 18:51:13 +0100 (BST)
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- cc: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>, <www-annotation@w3.org>, <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>, HTML WG <w3c-html-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > So one approach the RE group could take is to define a document namespace > which is in fact defined as the Tidied version of something, where there is a > reulst defined for when Tidy just gives up. > > A variation is to annotate a given docuemnt with an annotation type of > "valid XML representation so we know what the xpointers refer to" or > something, and make Xpointers refer to that (and define it, also, as the > result of applying Tidy or something, so the actual thing can be > autogenerated). Yes, that's essentially what Jim and I are doing. > Anyone want to make a server that does this? Yes. A server doing exactly that is in the very-near-future plans, as a demo application of mod_xml. It'll be somewhat akin to tidy, but (unlike tidy) it is DTD-aware. -- Nick Kew Site Valet - the mark of Quality on the Web. <URL:http://valet.webthing.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 10 April 2002 13:51:19 UTC