- From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 20:43:00 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
- Cc: chas@munat.com
Our next teleconference will be held Monday, 15 October 2001 at the regularly scheduled time: 10:00 AM Eastern Time (14:00 UTC/GMT). To find out what time it is in your time zone use the Time Zone Converter [1]. It will take place on the MIT bridge: +1 617.258.7910 Agenda for Monday: - EARL 1.0? Sean has suggested that we move to 1.0 and in doing so, change the structure of the assertions a bit and expanding what we mean by testSubjects (e.g., identifying new resources by line number). http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-er-ig/2001Oct/0010.html Charles responded that we ought to play with 0.95 further, while SBP was concerned about having people implement 0.95 then moving to 1.0. Sean says, "I think that it was a mistake to specify the model and syntax in one recommendation, because it gets people thinking that the syntax specified therein is the only possible serialization, or (perhaps even worse) the best possible serialization. " I'm assuming the recommendation you are referring to is RDF or are you referring to EARL? - Timeline I would like to have a complete end-to-end process demonstrable by CSUN for a session I hope to give (I'm submitting my proposal this week). That gives us 5 months to get the pieces together - which seems reasonable! Pieces that we need: 1. test files. we already have a bunch from Josh and Chris and hopefully WCAG will be generating more, although since they are tied up in larger issues perhaps we ought to create more of them. 2. A tool that will collect results from a variety of evaluation tools This will be the non-existent WART that Charles Munat has already agreed to work with me on. http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/WART/plan.html 3. A tool that will create a report from the results of WART. Should be easy to create an XSLT to do this. - Test specification languages I sent a note this week about some of the languages I had found. What do people think the next step should be? This seems to be part of the end-to-end process...although the suite of test files could be used instead of test specifications...unless we want to wrap each test file in meta info about the test... http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-er-ig/2001Oct/0011.html - Test suites UAAG is meeting next week to discuss a test suite for UAAG conformance. I will attend the meeting to promote use of EARL and likely volunteer us to work on a tool that will generate EARL to store results of tests. http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2001/10/ftf-agenda.html - QA The QA Activity is having their first F2F meeting Nov 12-13 in Brussels (Belgium). http://www.w3.org/2001/11/qa-f2f-agenda.html EARL is on the agenda. Are there specific questions we would like raised or topics discussed? The primer should be ready for that meeting. <illustration>Wendy kicks self yet again to get action finished to work on primer</illustration> Be well, --wendy [1] http://www.timezoneconverter.com/cgi-bin/tzc.tzc -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative seattle, wa usa /--
Received on Saturday, 13 October 2001 20:40:10 UTC