Re: EARL 1.0 Draft Specification

Hey this is quite cool.

I think that there are a few ways you could clean it up...

One is to remove all the syntax stuff to linked examples for people who are
interested, and just have the prose description stuff (which is very cool)
in the main page.

It would also be good for the group to formally agree that the canonical
syntax is XML RDF, or to formally agree that there are two syntaxes and a
defined conversion algorithm, or whatever.

And the other thing is for us to do more work on looking at existing
implementations and how to make something of them, and to collect the
information we have about them.

Cheers

Charles

On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Sean B. Palmer wrote:

  Attached as <<1.0spec.html>>. In researching for this specification, I
  came to the conclusion that our current documentation is really poor
  (which admittedly is mainly my fault for not documenting what I was
  doing). Relying on people to work out EARL from the RDF Schema was not
  a good idea :-)

  Hopefully, the attached specification will start to make up for that.
  Feedback and comments are most welcome.

  Cheers,

  --
  Kindest Regards,
  Sean B. Palmer
  @prefix : <http://webns.net/roughterms/> .
  :Sean :hasHomepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> .


-- 
Charles McCathieNevile    http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  phone: +61 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative     http://www.w3.org/WAI    fax: +1 617 258 5999
Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia
(or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)

Received on Monday, 26 November 2001 06:33:43 UTC