Re: EARL Primer notes

Thanks for the comments, Phill.

I actually think I will use SVG and WCAG, but make it more clear what I'm 
talking about. I want to highlight the SVG work since they have a test 
suite and it is an example that several people are familiar with.

All the info about EARL is public. Please share it!

Be well,
--wendy

At 04:57 PM 5/18/01 , Phill Jenkins wrote:
>Wendy, good high level intro.
>
>one question and one comment:
>
>Comment:
>Since this is a very basic intro and you are trying to avoid techno-jargon,
>I would recommend avoiding terms like SVG and WCAG.
>
>Instead of
>
>... Or if a user agent displays SVG images properly.
>"Properly" is defined by the SVG specification.
>"Accessible" is defined in WCAG.
>
>I think "browser, HTML, and specification" would work though:
>
>... Or if a browser displays HTML properly.
>"Properly" is defined by the specification.
>"Accessible" is defined in a W3C specification:
>Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG)
>
>
>Question:
>How public is EARL?  WAI/ER/IG [1] is a public page, but I think the
>Overview [2] is a member only doc, etc.
>Since IBM is a W3C member co, I can share EARL with others in IBM right?
>
>[1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/IG/#earl
>[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/03/earl/
>
>Regards,
>Phill Jenkins,  (512) 838-4517
>IBM Research Division - Accessibility Center
>11501 Burnet Rd,  Austin TX  78758    http://www.ibm.com/able
>
>
>Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>@w3.org on 05/18/2001 12:56:40 PM
>Hello all,
>
>I don't know if this is too basic, ...

--
wendy a chisholm
world wide web consortium
web accessibility initiative
seattle, wa usa
tel: +1 206.706.5263
/--

Received on Friday, 18 May 2001 20:20:03 UTC