- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 05:53:33 -0400 (EDT)
- To: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
- cc: <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
I think we very definitely want to be able to have these things in conflict - if I say your thing is good and greegory says it isn't you need to know that there are differences of opinioon and work out who to trust... Chaals On Thu, 17 May 2001, Sean B. Palmer wrote: Hmm... the value of earl:toDate obviously has to be later than earl:fromDate, but I'm not sure how to constrain that using RDF semantics yet. The whole datatypes area is a bit dodgy, so prose will have to do it for now. Anyway, it's also possible to say that something fails and passes the same test - and I don't think it's something we want to constrain. Let the parsers figure it out.
Received on Thursday, 17 May 2001 05:53:38 UTC