Re: AERT issues

Wendy,

Thanks for resolving/moving these issues. They look fine to me.

Chris


----- Original Message -----
From: "Wendy A Chisholm" <wendy@w3.org>
To: <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 2:45 PM
Subject: AERT issues


> Hello,
>
> I finally got around to updating the issues list [1] per our telecon on
> Monday [2].  I've been going through a few more and here are my
> conclusions. We can include this as a brief discussion on Monday's
telecon.
>
> One thing that I did different from the decision on Monday, was put #17 as
> an issue for xtech rather than ATAG.  It's requesting a definition of
> multimedia which seems to go more with xtech than atag.
>
> Here are the other changes i've made:
>
> #20 Allow user to change the units of measure.
> a new technique for ATAG-TECHS, therefore ATAG issue.
>
> #22 Check document for missing quote markup
> Moved to WCAG [HTML Tech] since need guidance on use of <Q>. There was a
> thread in January 2001, but I don't think any resolution.
>
> #23. ABBR values should be shorter than 15 characters.
> Moved to ATAG.  This is describing a possible technique for identifying
> abbreviations and if they are pronounceable.  Looks like a someday pile
and
> not something critical.
>
> #25. Testing embedded technologies
> Moved to ATAG.
>
> #26. Server-side to client-side image map conversion
> Moved to ATAG.
>
> #27. Logical tab order
> Closed.
>
> #31. Provide general information about a site
> Moved to ATAG
>
> #43. Priorities for techniques based on level of heuristics
> closed.
>
> #44. HTTP headers - check for refresh?
> Uncertain of the issue.  Does anyone remember this one?  William? you
> raised the question.  LK took an action item, but I don't see any
> follow-up.  Should we consider this closed?
>
> #47. Checking A elements for valid text content
> closed
>
> #48. Checking for quoted text
> Moved to ATAG.
>
> #50. Suggested repair for updating equivalents of dynamic content
> Moved to [WCAG Scripting Tech]. Although this is a discussion about
> repairing dynamic content, I think the definition of what it takes to be
> equivalent needs to come from WCAG.
>
> #51. Identifying OBJECTs
> Moved to ATAG
>
> #52. Checking for device independent event handlers
> Moved to WCAG [Scripting Tech]
>
> #53-60 - didn't get to yet.
>
> --wendy
> [1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/IG/ert/ert-open-issues.html
> [2] http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/2001/07/09-minutes.html
>
> --
> wendy a chisholm
> world wide web consortium
> web accessibility initiative
> seattle, wa usa
> tel: +1 206.706.5263
> /--
>

Received on Monday, 16 July 2001 11:56:00 UTC