- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 01:21:22 +0100
- To: "William Loughborough" <love26@gorge.net>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
Since more and more people are starting to ask, we should probably have some definitive answer that we all agree on (for any value of all). So, here's my first attempt at an elevator hook, arranged as "what", "why", and "how":- What:- EARL - the Evaluation And Report Language - is an RDF based system/model/framework/+ for making scoped evaluations about resources/things/RDF resources/+, being developed by the W3C WAI Evaluation and Repair Tools group. EARL is non constraining in the range of things that can be evaluated, or the range of conformance criteria that these things can be evaluated against, but it does provide a vocabulary to facilitate scoped reports. Why:- EARL can be used for a number of applications, for example, Quality Assurance, simple Web site ratings (er... too much like PICS in some senses), authoring tool and user agent ratings and bug reports, device independence testing and rating, and so on. Being based on RDF, EARL is also Semantic Web compatable, and tools produced by the W3C's Semantic Web activity may be able to be used on EARL. How:- In general, an EARL evaluation consists of a context, and then an assertion which consists of the thing being evaluated, the conformance criteria, and the validity status. For example, contextual information may include information such as creator details, platform, and so on. The thing beiong evaluated could be a Web page, or a tool. The conformance criteria could be something like a WCAG checkpoint or a syntax rule in a schema, and the validity status could be something as simple as "pass or fail" or something more granular with, for example, a certain level of confidence. -- Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer @prefix : <http://webns.net/roughterms/> . :Sean :hasHomepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> .
Received on Monday, 9 July 2001 20:21:57 UTC