- From: Leonard R. Kasday <kasday@acm.org>
- Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2001 11:21:12 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org, w3c-wai-au@w3.org
Suggestions for the agenda at http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/meetings/9jan01.html Re Evaluation (and Repair) language (EARL) which is already on the agenda: What would motivate authoring tool designers to input EARL? To output EARL? E.g., to avoid need to do all testing, to address test results from third party. What should authoring tool do to make application of EARL easier (e.g. id on each element) Possible additional topic: Also discussion of plenary. How to coordinate meetings? Have one big meeting? Whom to invite? Len -- Leonard R. Kasday, Ph.D. Institute on Disabilities/UAP and Dept. of Electrical Engineering at Temple University (215) 204-2247 (voice) (800) 750-7428 (TTY) http://astro.temple.edu/~kasday mailto:kasday@acm.org Chair, W3C Web Accessibility Initiative Evaluation and Repair Tools Group http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/IG/ The WAVE web page accessibility evaluation assistant: http://www.temple.edu/inst_disabilities/piat/wave/
Received on Friday, 5 January 2001 11:21:14 UTC