- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 15:10:02 -0500 (EST)
- To: "Leonard R. Kasday" <kasday@acm.org>
- cc: <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
This is legal, but it means that you go fetch the thing identified and there
is a step required where a person has to read the document to understand
where to find what triple-A means.
(I should have used meets1 or meets2 - these are defined within the scheme
already, and mean "meets to priority 1 level")
Charles McCN
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Leonard R. Kasday wrote:
Chaaz said:
> CMN:it doesn't say what level it conforms to WCAG at. (I recently
adjusted the ATAG sources so
> that there is an explicit URI that can be used for asserting conformance
at each of the three possible levels).
Instead of having a separate wcag URI for each level of conformance, could
we use wcag to define a namespace? e.g.
<rdf:RDF xmlns:wcag="http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/#Conformance"
xmlns:conform="http://www.w3.org/1999/11/conforms/">
<rdf:Description about="Overview.html">
<conform:meets wcag:triple-A>
</rdf:Description>
Is this legal? If so, any advantages or disadvantages?
Len
--
Leonard R. Kasday, Ph.D.
Institute on Disabilities/UAP and Dept. of Electrical Engineering at Temple
University
(215) 204-2247 (voice) (800) 750-7428 (TTY)
http://astro.temple.edu/~kasday mailto:kasday@acm.org
Chair, W3C Web Accessibility Initiative Evaluation and Repair Tools Group
http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/IG/
The WAVE web page accessibility evaluation assistant:
http://www.temple.edu/inst_disabilities/piat/wave/
--
Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +1 617 258 5999
Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053, Australia
(or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Tuesday, 6 February 2001 15:10:13 UTC