- From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 14:13:31 +0200
- To: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
- cc: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
Aaron, could you reformulate the examples at http://infomesh.net/2001/03/earl/0.9-ex[1,2,3].n3 with your model, so see how simpler it is ? (with all the bits, not a simplified n3 version like here) Sean, what do you think about Aaron's model ? Thanks > I've been working with Sean on the EARL Schema, and I've come up with this > simplified model: > > :Sean earl:asserts { :page :altTag [ > :result :Fail ; > :confidence :High ; > :comment "He put in a longDesc but forgot the alt for some reason." ; > :date "2001-04-22" . > ] .} . > > Or in English: Sean asserts "page fails the altTag test". > > The basic concept is that an evaluator (a person or a tool) makes an > assertion along the lines of: > > testSubject -test-> Result > > This model can be considered analogous to the buttons on the bottom of pages > that say "Validate This Page". They link from the page (testSubject) to the > Result. The result includes more information about the output of the test, > including comments, confidence, etc. > > While this would be the basics of the EARL assertion, further information, > such as descriptions of the parties and tests involved could be included in > the document or gathered from elsewhere. This improves extensibility > greatly, since other parties can provide information about the evaluators, > pages, and tests involved. An example would be: > > :page > a :WebContent ; > earl:testURI <http://example.org/page> ; > earl:testDate "2000-04-22" . > > :Sean > a :Person ; > :name "Sean B. Palmer" ; > :email <mailto:sean@mysterylights.com> . > > :altTag > :name "Alt Tag" ; > :comment "Test for an altTag on every image." ; > :suite <http://example.org/images/> . > > I'm not on the list, so please CC responses to me. Thanks. > > -- > [ Aaron Swartz | me@aaronsw.com | http://www.aaronsw.com ]
Received on Monday, 23 April 2001 08:13:48 UTC