- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 21:35:47 +0100
- To: "Danny Ayers" <danny@panlanka.net>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
> My humble opinion is that your normative & informative > should be a bloody picture, not unlike what Sean's done. > Please don't end up in a slurry. Hmm... the two problems with "bloody pictures" is that they're 1) not machine processable, 2) difficult for me to draw. That little SVG picture (actually, I'm quite proud of it) of the EARL schema took me many hours... the N3 schema takes seconds. But you're right... we have to make sure that anyone can understand this; this is the WAI after all. That's why I drew the diagram, because I knew that if *I* had a hard time understanding what I was writing, that other people would too:-) Incidentally, the schema has progressed quite a bit onwards, and is now looking quite a bit more ordered. I'll try to produce a stable version so that people can discuss it on the telecon properly, without having to worry that it'll change in five minutes because I forgot something! In fact, I even wrote a little RDF Schema validator, to help make sure that I did it right. I'm trying very hard to make sure that the RDF model is a very close replica of what Daniel drafted up. P.S. Danny, in future - please try touching your nose with your eyes shut before you send a mail. If you can't do it, don't send the mail :-) -- Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer @prefix : <http://webns.net/roughterms/> . :Sean :hasHomepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> .
Received on Sunday, 22 April 2001 16:35:54 UTC