Re: EARL 0.9

I'm also very glad to hear that.  N3 much easier for humans to discuss.  If 
there's a rigorous correspondence between N3 and RDF, or a N3 and subset of 
RDF, I'd see no problem in using it as an alternative notation.

Philisophically after all, not everything is in angle brackets.  For 
example The Xpointer

xpointer(id('list37')/item[1]/range-to(following-sibling::item[2]))

One could imagine an angle bracket notation for this, e.g.

<xpointer>
   <id arg="list37" />
   etc, whatever ...
</xpointer>

But a more compact notation is used.

Len


At 06:30 PM 4/20/01 -0400, Dan Brickley wrote:
>On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, Sean B. Palmer wrote:
>
> > Dan Brickley <mailto:danbri@w3.org> wrote:-
> >
> > > Notation3 is an experimental cute hack from TimBL and DanC;
> > > if you like I can raise this at the next SW CG meeting.
> >
> > Yes please.
>
>OK, I've requested an agenda slot for this on the SW CG. With WWW10 and
>the W3C AC meeting looming, we may not get to this immediately. If you
>don't hear back in 3 weeks ping me by email or IRC. (I'm not asking for
>any big decision from SW CG, just want to keep everyone informed of
>interest in N3...)
>
>cheers,
>
>Dan
>
>--
>http://www.w3.org/People/DanBri/

--
Leonard R. Kasday, Ph.D.
Institute on Disabilities/UAP and Dept. of Electrical Engineering at Temple 
University
(215) 204-2247 (voice)                 (800) 750-7428 (TTY)
http://astro.temple.edu/~kasday         mailto:kasday@acm.org

Chair, W3C Web Accessibility Initiative Evaluation and Repair Tools Group
http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/IG/

The WAVE web page accessibility evaluation assistant: 
http://www.temple.edu/inst_disabilities/piat/wave/