Re: EARL 0.9

I'm also very glad to hear that.  N3 much easier for humans to discuss.  If 
there's a rigorous correspondence between N3 and RDF, or a N3 and subset of 
RDF, I'd see no problem in using it as an alternative notation.

Philisophically after all, not everything is in angle brackets.  For 
example The Xpointer


One could imagine an angle bracket notation for this, e.g.

   <id arg="list37" />
   etc, whatever ...

But a more compact notation is used.


At 06:30 PM 4/20/01 -0400, Dan Brickley wrote:
>On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, Sean B. Palmer wrote:
> > Dan Brickley <> wrote:-
> >
> > > Notation3 is an experimental cute hack from TimBL and DanC;
> > > if you like I can raise this at the next SW CG meeting.
> >
> > Yes please.
>OK, I've requested an agenda slot for this on the SW CG. With WWW10 and
>the W3C AC meeting looming, we may not get to this immediately. If you
>don't hear back in 3 weeks ping me by email or IRC. (I'm not asking for
>any big decision from SW CG, just want to keep everyone informed of
>interest in N3...)

Leonard R. Kasday, Ph.D.
Institute on Disabilities/UAP and Dept. of Electrical Engineering at Temple 
(215) 204-2247 (voice)                 (800) 750-7428 (TTY)

Chair, W3C Web Accessibility Initiative Evaluation and Repair Tools Group

The WAVE web page accessibility evaluation assistant:

Received on Saturday, 21 April 2001 19:43:39 UTC