- From: Bruce Bailey <bbailey@clark.net>
- Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 16:23:15 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
- Cc: "Web Accessibility Initiative" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
> This review period will end Thursday, April 6 2000. > Please send review comments before that date to w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org. > [1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/IG/ert/ > Technique 1.1.1 [priority 1] Check IMG elements for valid "alt" > attribute ... > Suggested repair: ... > <li> If the image is assumed to be a bullet, suggested text > should be "bullet". > <li> If the image is assumed to be a horizontal rule, > suggested text should be "horizontal rule". I propose that this should read: <blockquote> <li> If the image is assumed to be a bullet, it is recommend that list items be marked up with the <LI> tag, possibly in conjunction with CSS -- which can render bullets using the author's choice of graphic. If this approach is not satisfactory (to the author), then ALT="*" is recommended. <li> If the image is assumed to be a horizontal rule, it is recommend that horizontal rules be marked up with the <HR> tag, possibly in conjunction with CSS -- which can render bullets using the author's choice of graphic. If this approach is not satisfactory (to the author), then ALT="--" is recommended. </blockquote> I would point out that <q>--</q> is what both Karl Ove H. and Wendy C. used in the signature portion of their email (a text-only medium) to convey the meaning of a horizontal rule... -- Bruce Bailey
Received on Thursday, 16 March 2000 16:26:13 UTC