- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 18:43:47 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- cc: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
The benefit of using the RDF schema technique for tracking evaluation is that it is easy to add a property (I would do it, if I had spent time working on this stuff recently) for "not-evaluated". Or to build tools such that unless there is an explicit statement about something it is assumed unevaluated. It is reasonable to specify this in the documentation for the RDF schema itself. (It already, because the statements are RDF, provides a framework for saying who said what when). Charles McCN On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Wendy A Chisholm wrote: 12 June 2000 ER WG Telecon Summary of action items and resolutions Action WC, CR, MC, BM think more about how to save state information during an evaluation session. Put on the agenda for the 17 July meeting. Resolved: Next week's meeting cancelled. Next meeting is 26 June.
Received on Monday, 12 June 2000 18:43:48 UTC