- From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2000 17:36:32 -0400
- To: love26@gorge.net, w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
- Cc: Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org>
>WL: I can't speak for W3C but I think the idea of us evaluating tools >vs. reporting on individual's experience with them is out of bounds. WC: Will tool developers see a difference? I know we talked about the marketing advantages of the database and the incentive it may give developers to make their tools conform to WAI guidelines. I realize we won't give anything a formal "WAI seal of approval" or "official evaluation tool of the WAI" but if someone searches for Level A compliant tools they will basically be finding those tools that we deem WAI conformant. In a sense this is a seal of approval. I still think this information is very useful. I also still have my concern that I expressed during the joint telecon on Tuesday. --wendy -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative madison, wi usa tel: +1 608 663 6346 /--
Received on Friday, 9 June 2000 17:29:25 UTC