- From: Harvey Bingham <hbingham@acm.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 16:41:20 -0400
- To: "WAI ER IG List" <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
At 2000-07-24 16:43-0400, Chris Ridpath wrote: >It looks to me that technique 6.3.1 (verify that the page is usable when >programmatic objects are disabled) is covered by technique 1.1 (Provide a >text equivalent for every non-text element). The specific techniques are: > >1.1.4 [priority 1] Check APPLET elements... >1.1.5 [priority 1] Check OBJECT elements... >1.1.10 [priority 1] Check SCRIPT elements... > >If we have a text equivalent for the programmatic object then the page is >usable when the programmatic object is disabled. How do we propose to get around the limitation of just a static text description of dynamically delivered information from the programmatic object? Is that really a "text equivalent?" As a minimum, do we need to clarify that scripts generating/delivering/transforming text objects can replace a static description for some user agents at least? >Make sense? > >Chris Regards/Harvey
Received on Wednesday, 26 July 2000 17:04:25 UTC