- From: Chris Ridpath <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 15:06:56 -0400
- To: "WAI ER IG List" <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
"1.3 Until user agents can automatically read aloud the text equivalent of a visual track, provide an auditory description of the important information of the visual track of a multimedia presentation. [Priority 1]" I'm a bit confused about the intent of this guideline. Perhaps "multimedia" may be the wrong term. A web page that contains text and images is 'multimedia' but does it require an audio description? Should we use a term something like "images in motion" instead? This would include movies (silent or with sound) applets, flash, animated gif etc. But would it then also include a series of web pages that form a complete presentation? This is a priority 1 item so we going to check that every object we define as 'multimedia' require an audio description. Audio descriptions are much more difficult to create and are much larger than text files. They also require synchronization with the multimedia file. So what sort of 'multimedia' require all the effort in creating the audio description? Comments appreciated. Chris
Received on Thursday, 20 July 2000 15:07:23 UTC