- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2000 10:51:57 -0700
- To: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- CC: "Chairs of the WCA, UA, ER-IG, ER-WG and PF groups" <w3c-wai-cg@w3.org>, w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
AG:: "So this issue involves both (WCA and/or PF) and UA at least. And
ER for the AERT impact."
WL: Not to mention some Working Groups in the W3C.
I wonder if "navigation" is another category parallel to "content",
"presentation", and "structure" since it is a peculiarly hypertextish
entity with no precedent in the past like the others clearly have? - And
it is a frequent add-on to the "document proper"? A ToC is "structure"
but many "navbar" items relate to the site itself rather than the
contents thereof?
--
Love.
ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
http://dicomp.pair.com
Received on Wednesday, 19 July 2000 13:52:39 UTC