- From: Michael Cooper <mcooper@cast.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 18:34:53 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
Looks good - I'd add the "ex" unit (about half an em) to the list of acceptable values. Michael > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-wai-er-ig-request@w3.org > [mailto:w3c-wai-er-ig-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Wendy A Chisholm > Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2000 6:28 PM > To: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org > Subject: Technique 3.4.A [priority 2] Check document for relative or > absolute units. > > > reworded based on michael's suggestions: > > Technique 3.4.A [priority 2] Check document for relative or > absolute units. > Discussion Status: > awaiting discussion > Evaluation: > For any HTML element defined to take a %LENGTH, %PIXELS, %MULTILENGTH, or > %MULTILENGTHS, a validated value should either end with "%" or begin with > "+" or "-" or use the "em" unit. > Exception: "width" and "height" attributes of IMG elements. > Example Language: > This element uses absolute units of measure rather than relative units of > measure. > Repair Technique: > Allow user to change the units of measure. > Test Files and Discussion Files: > -- > wendy a chisholm > world wide web consortium > web accessibility initiative > madison, wi usa > tel: +1 608 663 6346 > /-- > >
Received on Wednesday, 26 January 2000 18:43:38 UTC