- From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2000 17:28:04 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
Technique 1.1.K is priority 3. However, it is a technique of a Priority 1 checkpoint. If the priority of the WCAG checkpoint is not inherited, then how do we define priorities for this document? I do not believe we can inherit the priority definitions from WCAG. The priority definitions would probably be similar to ATAG [1] yet have to be stated in the context of this document. If we define priorities for this document, are we expecting people to conform to it? If we are expecting people to conform to it, then I think that implies we want to take this to Recommendation status. Do we want to take it to Recommendation or release it as a Note? thoughts? --wendy [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/PR-WAI-AUTOOLS-19991026/#priorities -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative madison, wi usa tel: +1 608 663 6346 /--
Received on Sunday, 23 January 2000 17:26:41 UTC