- From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 11:44:15 +0100
- To: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- cc: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
will you keep the organization as evaluation/repair/filter ? > Hi all, > > Judy asked that I update the list of existing tools [1] so that more > information is provided for each entry. She asked that I use EO's list of > browsers as a model [2]. It's my understanding that EO had several > discussions to determine the information that ought to be provided for each > entry. I have only edited the first four entries. So far, I have been > including: > 1. name/URL > 2. who it is from > 3. brief description of what it does > 4. does it run locally or on the server > 5. what platform does it run on > > is there other information we should provide for each tool? > > ratings? (as i did with the The Web Page Accessibility Self-Evaluation Test) > usability vs. accessibility? > year released? this might be harder to track since a. i'm not sure how > easily this info is available for all of these, plus if they are releasing > new version regularly we would have to keep this up to date. > others? > > --wendy > > [1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/existingtools.html > [2] http://www.w3.org/WAI/References/Browsing > -- > wendy a chisholm > world wide web consortium > web accessibility initiative > madison, wi usa > tel: +1 608 663 6346 > /--
Received on Thursday, 13 January 2000 05:44:31 UTC