- From: Chris Ridpath <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 10:15:35 -0500
- To: <dd@w3.org>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>, "Wendy A Chisholm" <wendy@w3.org>
> I think 75 is too short. I recently had to describe images in 136 > characters. > Perhaps a set limit won't work. Can we suggest in our technique that the prompt for ALT text should include something like "Alt text should be brief"? Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org> To: Chris Ridpath <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca> Cc: <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>; Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2000 10:00 AM Subject: Re: null alt-text, surveys, and progress of ERT (was: Re: null alt-text, spacers, etc. etc.) > > > This seems to be a very contentious issue so perhaps a user survey could > > help to bring consensus. Can we get the survey going soon? > > What would be the question(s) on the survey ? > > > I have a few comments on your technique 1.1.A: > > One comment I have is what is our recommendation (if any) for when to > use alt="" ? > > > On rereading the technique I noticed that we have the suggested maximum > > length of ALT text at 150 characters. I don't think we discussed this max > > and it seems a bit long to me. I suggest we reduce the suggested maximum > > length of ALT text to only 75 characters. > > I think 75 is too short. I recently had to describe images in 136 > characters. > > This sentense above was 76 characters. > >
Received on Wednesday, 12 January 2000 10:16:05 UTC