- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 09:30:48 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- cc: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
I think what you are describing is analog processing - it is what some machines are designed to do and what nervous systems do. As I understand fuzzy logic it actually adds a bit of randomness to the factorisation in general opening things a bit wider, and then testing the resulting conclusions, rather than deriving the validity of the conclusions from the presumed validity of the premises. There are several automated test for readability - have a look at a tool like MS Word. Charles McCN On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Wendy A Chisholm wrote: Hi all, What do people know about fuzzy logic? It seems that we might want to investigate the topic for the guidelines. It is my understanding (this is from a conversation with Bert Bos yesterday) that you take decisions from several sources and factor them together. The basic idea is that truth is not black or white but that there are shades of grey. You poll a number of sources for their opinion and determine a shade of grey (0 through 1) that gets rounded to final answer that is either 0 or 1. For example: Checkpoint 14.1 Use the clearest and simplest language appropriate for a site's content. There are many methods to determine the reading level or legibility of a body of text (i don't know that any have been automated). We could take the results of several, and combine them in some way to determine the "clarity" of content. thoughts? --wendy -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative madison, wi usa tel: +1 608 663 6346 /-- -- Charles McCathieNevile mailto:charles@w3.org phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053 Postal: GPO Box 2476V, Melbourne 3001, Australia
Received on Thursday, 27 April 2000 09:30:52 UTC