- From: Marja-Riitta Koivunen <marja@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 Sep 1999 10:09:10 -0400
- To: dd@w3.org
- Cc: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
At 02:40 PM 9/2/99 +0200, Daniel Dardailler wrote: > >Thanks for the review Marja > >> - Entering name etc. seems to be optional. The tool should also state that >> they are not demanded. > >well, I really want people to fill their name and email in, but I >don't want to force them, so I'm just presenting them with the text >field. I'm concerned that if I add "optional" somewhere, they will not >fill it in at all. on the other hand, if they think it is demanded and they don't want to give it they might not send the report at all >> - Would be nice to know how many steps there are. > >just added on the first page > >> - Could we have an option Reset also next to send info? > >You mean, in step4 ? something different than the back button ? yes, so that you can still change your mind when you have seen all there is >> - The text is long. I would simplify the message text a little bit e.g.: >> >> Hello, >> >> This message comes to you from the World Wide Web Consortium's Web >> Accessibility Initiative (W3C WAI) report tool at >> http://www.w3.org/WAI/report resulting from a review carried out by a user >> (cc: field) of your Web page or site. >> >> This user experienced difficulty accessing your page either due to a >> disability (visual, auditory, physical, or cognitive) or due to device >> limitations (poor connection bandwidth, no support for graphics or support >> turned off, a voice interface such as a webphone, etc.). Please consider >> the user's comments below. >> >> The reviewer found accessibility problems with your Web page or site. >> >> URL: www.w3.org >> Date: Thu Aug 26 15:37:05 1999 > >that part is not really shorter. I also changed the order a bit to group general things talking about the tool together and then go to the actual errors and their explanation. I thought it was shorter as a whole. >> Each problem is followed by a link to relevant information in the Web >> Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. >> >> Other: testing the tool >> >> Your name, the URL of your page, and the URLs of other pages reviewed using >> this tool have been entered in a W3C WAI database that we maintain >> (currently implemented as an archived mailing list visible at >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/wai-report-db). > >Do you want to get rid of the last two paragraphs: No, just to make the beginning shorter and easier to find the problems and related info as the uri of the evaluated page. Marja > Please take the time to review this report and take action on the > problems reported. If you have questions, please notify us at > wai-report@w3.org, so that we can re-evaluate your page. > > Note. These comments were made by someone who visited your Web site > who may not be affiliated with W3C or the WAI. For this reason, WAI > does not take responsibility for the accuracy of this report nor the > comments made in the report. For more information about the W3C Web > Accessibility Initiative please visit http://www.w3.org/WAI. > >there are important I think. > >> - could the webmaster have an easier ui to these reviews if there are more >> of them? A Web page? > >right now, they have the archive, but good idea for improvement. >
Received on Thursday, 2 September 1999 10:11:52 UTC