- From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 04 May 1999 12:26:32 +0200
- To: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
Present: Daniel Dardailler (chair/scribe) William Loughborough Chris Ridpath Bruce Bailey Len Kasday Michael Cooper Next meeting: not decided. - we started late because of MIT bridge problem ("just rings") then we used the list of issues sent to the list as basis for our discussion. - background issue: best is to force the body and put the original page and its background in a table cell (this way if table color are not supported, at least the bobby report is readable, and the page background is lost) - upload feature for 3.2; need to see how to address the issue of attached content (e.g. image) when html is uploaded. - in this case download seems irrelevant too. btw, should download info be there by default ? same with browser compatibility (opinions vary in the call on what should be presented by default) - how feasible is an algorithm for checking contrast background ? discuss various techniques using intensity, color blindness intelligence, etc. probably not for 3.2 but for 4.0 - issue with less/combining hats: Michael agrees it's bad looking today, not sure how much can be fixed this week - issue with back pointers to the page from the report, for 3.2 probably - Daniel suggested to put the report first and the content-with-hat later only when back link are implemented (would also solve unterminated element issue) right now moving the toc menu up would be enough - disclaimer/manual people things the bobby approved logo should go after the manual checking: Michael to look at that for this release discussed idea of keeping approved page in a database - discussion alt="" for A and AREA and no href in the page (or no content in the anchor) - Len also suggested for special alt to look at the idiosynchracies of popular editors (alt="foo.gif 234K" in FP) - tentative timeline: 3.2 targeted in 2 months, 4.0 Xmas 99
Received on Tuesday, 4 May 1999 06:26:36 UTC